Saturday, March 16, 2013

The Writer Takes a Vacation


It's the lipstick that has discolored the marble.

I returned this week from a family vacation. For ten days – ten days! – I wrote nothing more substantial than a text message. That’s a little distressing for someone like me who spends a good part of most days spinning stories.

For reading I brought only my Kindle and the latest issue of Poets and Writers, which features residencies, conferences, and book festivals – working vacations for people like me. I’ve attended precisely one conference where I wasn’t on faculty, and that was Squaw Valley Writers, an outfit I can’t recommend enough. A festival would be fun, but again the only ones I’ve attended were in-state, and I was part of the program.

I’ve been tempted by residencies - and Cinthia Ritchie’s recent blog post on residencies tempted me even more. But I’m fortunate to have easy access to two retreat-like settings where I can write – our home here on Hiland Mountain, and a cabin at Matanuska Glacier. Still, there’s something appealing about other artists quietly creating around you. Hedgebrook is on my list to apply for one day.

When he’s working on a novel, David Vann writes every day, vacation or no. There’s a lot to be said for momentum, but when I’m vacationing with family, they come first, hands down. I could get up early and write, but then my mind would divide itself for the rest of the day, and I’d rather be fully present with those I love much and see seldom. So I left the revision projects on my Kindle for airplane reading and before bed, I stuck to books I could study but not try to rewrite.

But to turn an old phrase, you can take the writer out of the story, but you can’t take the story out of the writer. We spent our last day strolling through Pierce Brothers Westwood Village Memorial Park, final resting place of the stars, shoehorned between Los Angeles skyscrapers. I dare you to look on Marilyn Monroe’s grave without a narrative beginning to form itself, vacation or no. No matter. There’s little that separates work and play in the life of a writer.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Wealth Woman: Kate Carmack and the Last Great Race for Gold (Chapter 1, in draft)

Wealth Woman is a narrative nonfiction book for adults on Kate Carmack and the Klondike Gold Rush from the perspective of those who were there first, the indigenous people of Alaska and the Yukon. My thanks to those who read and commented on the first chapter. Sue Pope has won a free autographed copy of my latest book, Black Wolf of the Glacier, a new release from the University of Alaska Press.

An updated version of the chapter appears below. Not that it's done, mind you.  

Email further comments to debvanasse (at) gmail.com or leave them below. Thanks for reading!


Kate Carmack and family aboard the Roanoke
August, 1899
Courtesy Dawson City Museum Archives



Chapter One of Wealth Woman
Narrative Nonfiction
by Deb Vanasse


The Roanoke is loaded with gold. Bags, cans, boxes, and crates cram its lower deck, jammed with a whopping ten tons of gold panned and sluiced by lucky devils in the northern wilderness. Only a year ago, no one had heard of the patch of low mountains and dense northern spruce now known as the Klondike. But these days, like an incantation of magic, the very word Klondike invokes prosperity, the vindication of the American dream and the triumph of the individual in its most measurable manifestation: wealth.
Nine days after departing the dreary and once sleepy port of St. Michael near the muddy mouth of the Yukon River, the Roanoke chugs toward the dock of the North American Transport Company in Seattle, a city that enjoys a symbiotic relationship with the Klondike and its magic, the city having built the magic and the magic having built the city. Four hundred fifty-eight passengers crowd her decks, eager for land. Since passing the Finger Islands, gateway from the Bering Sea to the Pacific Ocean, they’ve endured rough, open waters. On an approach to Seattle that’s blessedly calm, you can now and again catch a whiff of the sickness that leveled the travelers, wealthy and common alike, when a howling August storm heaved and tossed the steamship. Two decades hence, such a storm will undo the vessel, but for now, the worst has been emptied stomachs.
Sunshine seeps past clouds to light the throng gathered on the docks to welcome the boat and its gold, women in cinched-waist dresses and high, narrow hats; men in suits and suspenders, bowlers and derbys and straw tops. Everyone wants to see who’s gotten rich in the Klondike and who has returned empty-handed. In the Gilded Age of Horatio Alger and unbridled capitalism, Americans are extolled to industry, thrift, and temperance. No one can quite reconcile the idea of gold so easy and plentiful that you need none of these virtues to claim it. The idea is as unsettling as it is enticing, and on this day in 1898, there is no small amount of envy as the Roanoke steams for shore, especially when it comes to the scruffy common folk on her decks, the nouveaux made riches by gold.
A particular challenge to American precepts on money, virtue, and class is the lone native woman on board the Roanoke, first called Shaaw Tlaa, now called Kate Carmack. Her distinction - her claim to fame, as it were, though to her such a concept is utterly foreign – is that she is the richest Indian woman in the world. Since the sixteenth century colony for which the Roanoke is named, hers is the first big collision between Indians and wealth. She knows nothing of the indigenous people who’ve gone before her and failed, leaders like Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse and Quanah Parker who’ve only recently been consigned to a scrubbed-out existence on lands no one else wants.
Forget the city of eighty thousand – the crowd gathered on just this one dock exceeds twice again the entire population of Kate’s Tagish Indian band, of whom she knows each by name. Like all indigenous people of Alaska and the Yukon, the Tagish travel in yearly rounds, following caribou, gathering berries, and harvesting salmon to cache for long, subarctic winters. They are Athabaskans, connected by language to larger and better-known tribes as distant as the Apache and the Navajo. Small in number – 300 at best – the Tagish speak their own language, but they also speak Tlingit, the language of their more powerful coastal neighbors.
To preserve their own substantial wealth, the Tlingit have kept the Tagish isolated behind a range of coastal mountains, making Kate’s people one of the last Native American bands to confront the ways of the West. Though Frederick Turner has famously called an end to it, the Tagish are seen as vestiges of yet another frontier – never mind that when your ideas about land don’t include boundaries, the whole idea of a frontier is pointless. Kate’s home is a borderless wilderness of poplar and aspen and willow, of mosses and lichens and berries, of wild onions and bear root and mushrooms. Home is where Animal Mother gave birth to the moose and the grizzly bear and the beaver, then hung a swing from four mountains and watched as each danced and sung its own song. She gave them their teeth and their horns and their antlers, and told them what to eat and how they must act.
Adapting is among the actions that have for centuries sustained the Tagish, but there’s a tipping point between adaptation and assimilation that they have yet to test. They are a people of action, their language driven by verbs, their integrity determined by how well they protect, relate, negotiate, behave, and adapt. In the form of luck, destiny visits them; they do not seek it out. In Kate’s essence, her yaahei, which is Shaaw Tlaa and not Kate, it is the journey that matters, not the end. The route is always a circle, the wayfinding easy when you pay close attention, behaving in prescribed ways that honor defined relationships.
In contrast, nineteenth century Americans are a people of objects, their language driven by nouns. Their habit is intrusion, for in their way of thinking, destiny requires pursuit; it is no coincidence that in their language, the words destiny and destination are so closely related. They travel in lines, point to point, toward tangible goals. They explore, they assert, they acquire, they profit. Among their most thrilling and coveted prizes is gold, of which Kate has quite a lot.

Her voyage began nineteen days ago, when she boarded the sternwheeler Cudahy to depart Dawson City, a boom town at the junction of the Klondike and Yukon Rivers. Before the big strike, this confluence was summer salmon fishing grounds the Tr’ondek Hwech’in, now displaced. Despite their fortune in gold, Kate has until now occupied with her husband and daughter a small, tidy cabin built of hand-hewn logs at No. 1 Bonanza, a claim that by one estimate will yield 2.5 million dollars in gold. There she has sewn fur mittens and baked bread to sell to neighboring miners, though she draws the line at taking in laundry.
Two weeks before Kate began her journey, a huge white tent went up across the river from Dawson, belonging to a woman who couldn’t be more different than Kate. In this four-hundred-pound tent, New York heiress Mary E. Hitchcock can host seventy-five dinner guests, serving them tinned oysters and asparagus and lobsters and ice cream made from the freezer she has brought to the wilderness. She can entertain her new friends with her gramophone and her movie projector and her portable bowling alley, not to mention her flock of pigeons, her parrot, her canaries, and a Great Dane.
Penned between practicing on her zither and mandolin, Mary Hitchcock kept a detailed journal of the same voyage Kate is about to complete, though in reverse, traveling by steamer and sternwheeler through the Pacific to the Bering Sea and up the Yukon River to Dawson. Steaming from the mainland toward the mouth of the Yukon with traveling companion Edith Van Buren, grand-niece of President Martin Van Buren, Mary Hitchcock was struck by the profound silence as their ship navigated a field of ice floes. A stretch of wet, windy days at the dreary Alaskan port of St. Michael tried her patience as they waited for the water in the Yukon to rise to a level that could accommodate their sternwheeler. It vexed her to learn that she would not, as promised, be among the first passengers to put off in Dawson that year.
Once they finally got on the river, Mary disembarked whenever the boat stopped, which was often, sternwheelers having large appetites for wood. Fighting off gnats and mosquitoes and horseflies, she gathered wild roses, mulberries, currants, and raspberries, as well as groundsel, which delighted the canaries. Where she could, she photographed Indians who turned out along the river, though she refused to descend into a traditional community house to photograph their dancing, for fear of the vermin, and she writes with some indignation of a group of Indian women who covered their heads with shawls, demanding a sitting fee. Though she misperceived the tundra as prairie with great potential for agricultural development, she admired the mountains and rapids and gorges on the approach to Dawson.
This is the country that Kate has left behind, though unlike Mary Hitchcock, she is unable to record her impressions of it, because she cannot read or write. But in the age of Yellow Journalism, American reporters are already poised to speak on her behalf. In order to find her way around, she will purportedly leave hatchet marks in the fancy woodwork of the Seattle Hotel. Random photos of Indian women will circulate, claiming to feature her image. With her husband, she will toss gold coins from the top floor of the hotel, causing mayhem among pedestrians who scramble for easy money.

Onboard with Kate is Portus B. Weare, owner of the Roanoke. A Chicago investor, Weare had the good sense to listen his old frontier crony John J. Healy, known all too well to Kate for his part in the death of her sister’s husband. Among his various exploits, Healy partnered with Weare to run boats – first one, then two of them - along the Yukon River five whole years before the Klondike opened up. This year alone, sixty new boats and barges are engaged in various stages of service to the gold fields, plowing across the North Pacific and up and down the Yukon at such an alarming rate that it’s a wonder they don’t collide. But Healy and Weare’s North American Transport Company was there early, giving the Alaska Commercial Company a run for its money.
Sternwheelers from the two rivals now race, quite literally, to and from the Klondike. Named after one of Weare’s cronies who made a fortune in Chicago meatpacking, the sternwheeler John Cudahy delivered Kate to the Roanoke, setting a new record as it zipped in six days from Dawson City to St. Michael. Weare is still beaming, though his mood darkens when he’s reminded of two gold heists that have plagued this voyage, one a theft from Kate’s brother Keish, known as Jim, and the culprits still at large. The papers will be all over that, and it won’t be good for business.
Discounting this loss, Jim, Kate, their nephew Kaa Goox, also called Charlie, and Kate’s husband George still have a quarter million dollars of gold stashed in the hull of the Roanoke, and this only a portion of the fortune they’ve wrestled from the frozen earth. Son of a California farmer, George Carmack claims credit for discovering the gold that set off the Klondike madness. So do the Indians.
As the Roanoke was about to depart for Seattle, the four of them posed for a photo. Though he should be at the peak of his game, Carmack looks roughest of the bunch, his suit coat rumpled and his tie loose at the collar. He’s not yet forty, but he suffers from rheumatism, which Kate doctors with traditional medicines, coltsfoot and devil’s club. A drifter who tried his hand at shepherding, which he hated, and the military, from which he went AWOL at the age of 22, Carmack showed up in the Yukon at a fortuitous time, when a marriage alliance with a white man seemed a wise move for the Tagish. Though George Carmack now claims the gold as his destiny, in truth he wandered the north for a dozen years with no real destination in mind. After all that time, Kate’s husband has finally written to his sister to tell her he’s married. His wife, he tells her, is Irish.
Interviewed in a Roanoke stateroom, Lying George, as his fellow prospectors dubbed him, complained he’d never seen the “true story” of the Klondike discovery in print. He found the mother lode on his thirty-sixth birthday, he claimed, along the banks of a creek that has since been renamed Bonanza, gold nuggets lying around for the taking. Before he’s through, Carmack will invoke many versions of this “true story.” Next year, he’ll take Kate and Charlie and Jim to the big expedition in Paris, he brags. But when he writes the final story of his life, he’ll omit Kate completely. It will be as if she never existed.
In the photo, Kate appears beautiful by any standard, posing assuredly behind a crate of gold, dressed in a dark frock with lace collar and sleeves, a shawl draped over her shoulders. While not the height of fashion, her flat-topped hat is graced with a length of fancy ribbon. On her wrist she wears a metal bracelet, and on her fingers, several rings. With a slight smile, she stands out among dozens of stern-faced men. At her husband’s feet sits their five-year-old daughter, who can’t recall a life without gold. Wearing a heavy dress and a lace-collared cape, Graphie Grace scowls, perhaps having already spied the high-topped button boots she’ll demand her father purchase right off another child’s feet to replace the Indian moccasins made by her mother.
In this photo, no one touches Carmack, but a fellow miner rests his hand on the shoulder of Kate’s brother Keish. Known also as Skookum, or “Strong” Jim, he strikes a handsome, confident pose in his three-piece suit, his derby hat tipped stylishly to the side, one hand in his pocket, the other on his hip, displaying a gold ring. Son of a clan leader, Jim is acclaimed for his prowess and strength. In a single load, he once packed 165 pounds of bacon over the Chilkoot Trail, dubbed the meanest thirty-three miles in history. Another time he went hand to claw with a grizzly. Jim befriended Carmack even before they became brothers-in-law, a relationship that to the Tagish is deeply infused with obligations. Even though one of Carmack’s lies involved Indians not being allowed to file Discovery claims, Jim has stuck by George, digging gold out of Bonanza Creek. Although somewhere between Dawson City and St. Michael, a thief substituted lead shot for $7000 of his gold, Jim appears nonplussed. Two years before striking it rich in the Klondike, an encounter with the fleeting Wealth Woman of Tagish legend bestowed Jim with luck, or so he hopes.
Standing so close to Jim that their arms overlap is Kaa Goox, known as Dawson Charlie. Among the Tagish, uncles take special responsibility for their nephews, rearing them almost as fathers would. Like his uncle, Charlie sports a smart three-piece suit, but he’s young and slight and his hands clasped at his waist betray his unease, as if he alone knows what’s ahead.
In truth, Seattle is a hardly the best place to make your first acquaintance with urban America in the waning years of the nineteenth century. Swindlers and speculators are everywhere. You can buy everything imaginable – and then some - for use in the arctic: compasses, mercury, patented Blizzard Resister Suits, Klondike underwear, Klondike hosiery, Klondike gloves. You can purchase frost extraction devices and insect-proof masks – pound for pound, the Klondike is rumored to be almost as heavy with mosquitoes as it is with gold. Would-be millionaires can equip themselves with automated gold pans and steam-powered sleds, crystallized eggs (some turn out to be nothing but cornmeal), scurvy cures, collapsible boats, Klondike bicycles, and slot machines that operate on gold nuggets instead of coins – all of it, save perhaps the scurvy cure, utterly worthless upon arrival in the North. Yet already sixty million dollars has been spent in the race for gold.
The Klondike feeds the longings of an adolescent nation in the throes of nineteenth-century capitalism. Industrialism has funneled wealth to the likes of Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan in quantities unimaginable to the average American. There are only two classes, declares Populist Jerry Simpson: the robbers and the robbed. Populist Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan has eschewed gold as the tool of greedy bankers, used to manipulate the nation’s supply money. “You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold!” he proclaimed.
Only six weeks before Bryan’s rallying cry, Carmack or one of the Tagish – it depends on whose version you believe – discovered the nuggets that led to a flood of gold that effectively ended a worldwide recession and set off a boom in transportation and industry to accommodate would-be millionaires in their rush north. Thanks to an enthusiastic advertising campaign launched by Erastus Brainerd, a former journalist who on the printed page rivals P.T. Barnum for showmanship, nearly all the traffic in the Seattle harbor now points toward the Klondike.
Nearly all the traffic, that is, except for the Roanoke, about to deliver Kate to the throng. Can wealth be her destiny? Everything in the nineteenth century American soul screams against it. But for Kate Carmack born Shaaw Tlaa, destiny is hardly the point. You trust in the combined sum of your actions to keep you whole, and you hope against hope that out of the mad rush for Klondike gold will come one legacy of triumph, not of wealth but of spirit.

Is it art? Creative, literary, and narrative non-fiction


One day I plan to write a book for writers called Don’t Do As I Did. Included will be a chapter on applying for grants and residencies.

I’ve been a slacker in this regard. In the spirit of better late than never, I thought I might apply for funding to help me finish Wealth Woman: Kate Carmack and the Last Great Race Before. From my own shrinking bank account, I’ve spent more than I care to admit on research, and I still have one more trip to fund. Beyond that, the grant application process is good for fine-tuning a project, and if awarded, a grant shows you’ve proven up through a competitive process.

But first there was the question of whether my project would qualify. So I queried the funding agency:

I'd like to apply for a project grant to finish my narrative nonfiction project Wealth Woman: Kate Carmack and the Last Great Race for Gold. But looking over past awards, I see few that have funded any sort of nonfiction projects, especially in recent years. Is there a preference perhaps for fiction and poetry? I don't want to waste everyone's time with an application that's not suited to the scope and interests of the program. 

The response:

Indeed, our program does not consider pure nonfiction work. The program supports "creative writing" and as such includes fiction, poetry, scriptworks and "creative" nonfiction. 

What’s “pure nonfiction”? What’s “creative nonfiction”? On the broader scale, what’s “art”?

Smarter people than I have been arguing about the nature of art since Cro-Magnon told the first story around a campfire. The advent of creative nonfiction has only complicated the question. If we’re talking about inventing facts, I can point you to piles of nineteenth century travelogues that play very loose with the facts. Does that make them art? Perhaps art is personal. But then that would exclude much brilliant, creative poetry, not to mention nonfiction and fiction, simply because the author herself is not immediately visible in the product. You say art must be original, but doesn’t that encompass all writing that’s not plagiarized?

As part of my research, I met this week with my re-found friend Phyllis, who happens to be a descendant of one of the women who’ll appear in my book. An anthropologist, Phyllis reminded me that the indigenous people of Alaska and the Yukon think in terms of process, not product.

Here’s how art looks from that perspective: In the acting of making, the artist activates pleasure. That’s my creative pursuit with this project. I’m writing Kate Carmack’s memoir on her behalf, her life as she would have seen it, or as closely as I can approximate that. Like memoir, her story is grounded in fact, but narrated in such a way that it activates delight and introspective in the reader.

Creative nonfiction is literary nonfiction is narrative nonfiction. That’s the prevailing sentiment among writers, as nearly as I can tell. Though I won’t invent dialogue, you’ll find nearly every other element of fiction at work in this story, including plot, tension, scene, character, and voice.

As it turns out, the grant officer reconsidered my question and amended the response: yes, they do consider narrative nonfiction. There goes my excuse.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Truth and Lies in Nonfiction


James Frey was hardly a trendsetter when he shocked the literary world with the things he made up in his memoir. You can’t do much better for embellishment in nonfiction than the team of George Carmack and George Snow, collaborating on Carmack’s memoir.

When George Carmack rushed to Fortymile to show off the $12.75 in coarse gold he’d tapped into a Winchester cartridge, he got a lukewarm reception from the prospectors there. “They would not believe him, his reputation for truth being somewhat below par,” said William Ogilvie, trusted surveyor and commissioner of Dawson City. “The miners said that he was the greatest liar this side of – a great many places.”

George T. Snow was an actor who brought vaudeville to gold camps at Fortymile, Circle City, and Dawson City. Authorized by the Yukon Order of Pioneers to compile a written history of prospecting in the Yukon, Snow got several of his mining friends, including Carmack, to write down their experiences. To these he applied his showmanship.

It’s tough sorting truth from fiction in the memoir started by Carmack and finished by Snow. This week I’ve been writing about the divided loyalties of Kate’s family, to their Tlingit relatives on the one hand and George Carmack on the other. Of primary importance to the region was access from the coast to the Yukon River over the Chilkoot Trail, a route tightly controlled by the coastal Tlingit.

There was another way in, over what came to be called the White Pass, but out of fear and respect for their Chilkoot relatives, the Tagish were reluctant to speak of it. In June of 1897, with much encouragement of Ogilvie, Kate’s brother Jim led Captain William Moore over the pass, an arduous journey that involved a lot of bushwhacking, as the trail was used only in winter.

In Carmack’s handwritten memoirs, there are two sentences about Jim taking him, too, over the White Pass. “I was about the second white man that ever went over that pass,” Carmack wrote. “I camped overnight near the place where the station is on the summit.” That’s all he says on the subject.

Did Jim really take Carmack over the White Pass that year? Maybe, but it doesn’t make a lot of sense, given Jim’s reluctance to defy his Chilkoot relations, not to mention the poor condition of the trail.

Writing years after the railroad went in through White Pass, Snow wrings quite a story out of Carmack’s two sentences:

We went up the Skagway and over the White Pass; I went to look this route over to see if a peak trail could not be built from salt water to the Lakes, although I could see that pass was nearly a thousand feet lower than the upper pass but it was some ten miles longer and the west side very rough and a pack trail would be very expensive. I camped one night at the summit right near where the station now is, and sitting by our campfire I got to thinking about that great unexplored country expanding for more than a thousand miles North of me. I seemed to have a vision of the future. I saw a huge locomotive with its long string of coaches gliding through that rocky divide and heard the echo from its hoarse whistle reverberating from the mighty granite cliffs. I turned to my companion and said Jim, by and by you hear big toot, toot, and seem big fire wagon go this way. Jim just gave a grunt… turned his back to the fire and went to sleep and left me to my visions.

Keep in mind that as memoir, this version doctored by Snow is used as a primary source. With this sort of embellishment, the nonfiction writer has a good deal of sorting to do. 

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Love and Marriage: the Marguerite Saftig Laimee complication

Marguerite Saftig Laimee, third wife of George Carmack. Courtesy Yukon Archives.



In Wealth Woman: Kate Carmack and the Last Great Race for Gold, there’s a chapter called “A Troublesome Question” in which the common thread is the shifting of alliances as a means of managing change. The action unfolds from the perspective of three Indians: Lunaat, the Tlingit chief who’s losing control of the Chilkoot Trail; Bob, a young Northern Tutchone on a death march to deliver news of the Fortymile gold strike; and Kitty, niece of Shaaw Tlaa (Kate) and first wife of George Carmack.

Of all alliances, marriage is among the most fascinating, and it doesn’t get much more fascinating than George Carmack’s three marriages, not only on a personal level, but because of the broader sociological entanglements each represents.

There’s much to discuss. Here, let’s stick to a simple complicating factor, in the person of one Marguerite Saftig Laimee Carmack, aka (to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police) Biddy McCarthy. In this particular chapter, she gets only a passing mention. I’ll have a lot more to say about her once she becomes George Carmack’s third wife.

What compelled Carmack to take an Indian bride? What were proportions of love, convenience, and strategic alliance were involved? To what extent did he care about Kitty, or later, about Kate? I wanted to reach deeply into the emotions of these alliances without resorting to speculation.

Marguerite, on the other hand, would just as soon have forgotten about her husband’s previous marriages. Read his memoirs, none written in his own hand, and you’d think she was his one and only. I had to comb other primary sources to verify that he first married Kitty, and to create a sense of what that meant to his bride. Here, an excerpt that begins with George Carmack staying behind with the Indians while his fellow prospectors leave the region for the winter:

Instructed by [Johnny] Healy, Carmack needed little persuading. The others went on, but he stayed with [Skookum] Jim on the shores of Lake Bennett, where Kitty and her family had come recently from their summer fish camp. As the caribou trampled by thousands through the narrow valley at the foot of the lake, she and Carmack were married, the Indian way.

There would be among prospectors and Yukon Indians many such marriages. As with all matters of love and allegiance, the motives and circumstances were many, but there was this overarching pattern: after mucking around for a few years in the North, a man would grow attached to a place and a lifestyle and the prospect of fortune just around the next bend in the river. But he would also tire of the company of men, and the longing for female companionship would become too strong to ignore. A white woman was out of the question. During the earliest years of prospecting on the Yukon, there simply were none.

Having come in along the northern route used by Hudson Bay traders, [Arthur] Harper, [Jack] McQuesten, and [Alfred ]Mayo all married Indian women in the summer of 1874, roughly three years after arriving in the North. Their wives were Koyukon Athabascans from the lower Yukon, nearly a thousand river miles from the Tlingit and Tagish. Theirs was a region already penetrated by Russians, some of whom had intermarried long before. While prospecting new territory, Harper, McQuesten, and Mayo might leave their wives in their villages for a year or two at a stretch, but for the most part the women lived with their husbands at the various trading posts they established up and down the Yukon, raising their children much as they had been raised, a hybrid lifestyle, part Indian and part white.

How did love factor into these matches? Undoubtedly there was an attraction, at least on the part of the husband. J. Bernard Moore, who with his father later founded the gold rush town of Skagway, followed the typical pattern. Just as Moore began to get lonely from three years of traveling up and down the Yukon, George Shotridge, son of Koh’klux, invited Moore to a potlatch. “I was twenty years old, with no great and serious thoughts of the future,” Moore said. “I felt light of heart, though lonesome at times, living in and seeing only the present.” Across the warm, crowded clan house, as Tlingit dancers swayed and rocked, back and forth and sideways, Moore locked eyes with a delicate girl of fourteen. She ran off, but when George Shotridge invited Moore to his house after the potlatch, there she was, the girl Moore called Minnie, daughter of George Shotridge and granddaughter of Koh’klux. Soon they were married.

Whether Carmack felt the same sort of attraction for her as Moore did for Minnie will never be known, because his third wife, Marguerite Laimee, erased any mention of Indian women from Carmack’s memoirs.

It would be a lot easier to write about Carmack’s first two marriages if Marguerite hadn’t burned his papers and excluded these women when she herself re-assembled his memoir. But then again, if Marguerite hadn’t come between George and his wife, Kate would never have confronted the choices that make her story so compelling.

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

On a Book Returned

Today I did something I’ve never done before: I returned a brand new hardcover book.

Like every author, I adore books. Like most authors I know, my budget is tight. Between travel and book-buying, I’ve already spent a few thousand dollars on research for Wealth Woman. Before I decide I have to own a particular resource, I weigh other options, mostly library and internet.

But sometimes those options are limited, or a particular book proves so valuable that I have to own it, so I can get my hands on it whenever I need it. That’s what happened with My Old People Say. Through interlibrary loan, I borrowed Catherine McClellan’s important but obscure ethnographic study, published in 1975 by the National Museums of Canada. Though McClellan has since consolidated some of her work into cheaper and more accessible formats, the information compiled in her full study illustrates the worldview and way of life of Kate Carmack’s Tagish band in such authentic detail that I decided I had to have the set no matter the cost, which turned out to be almost $100 from Abe Books.

Then there are books too new for the library, like the one I’m returning to the bookseller, a biography of another wealthy woman who lived during Kate Carmack’s era. I got excited when I found the title, certain the parallel stories of these two women would be fascinating. I’d already discovered one such gem when I picked up from Jeff Brady’s Skaguay News and Books, more or less on a whim, a nice firsthand account called Two Women in the Klondike. Though I already owned two shelves of Klondike histories and knew more trivia about the gold rush than anyone has a right to, I absorbed every word Mary Hitchcock’s engaging firsthand account, first published in 1899 and re-released by the University of Alaska Press.

A wealthy East Coast heiress, Hitchcock went to the Klondike on a whim, bringing with her a bowling alley, portable movie theater, and a flock of pigeons. I couldn’t have invented a more interesting counterpart for the newly wealthy Kate Carmack, who as it happened traveled out of the Klondike on exactly the same river route as Hitchcock on almost exactly the same dates, so that I was able to draw from her account specifics even on weather. Since Kate never learned to read or write, I relied Hitchcock’s account of her river journey to draft passages like this one, helping to set the scene along with the cultural context for my book:

Hitchcock disembarked when the boat stopped, which was often, sternwheelers having large appetites for wood. While fighting off gnats and mosquitoes and horseflies, she gathered wild roses, mulberries, currants, and raspberries, along with groundsel, which delighted her canaries. She was forever photographing the Indians along the river, though for fear of vermin she refused to descend into a traditional community house to capture the dancing, and she writes with indignation of a group of Indian women who covered their heads with shawls, demanding a sitting fee. The tundra she mistook for prairie, lauding its potential for agricultural development. As the river narrowed, there were mountains and rapids and gorges, all wild and picturesque.

Pleased with Two Women in the Klondike, I got greedy. I found the book I’m returning, a new release. Certain it would offer up even more gems I could use, I bought it. I know book research isn’t a treasure hunt, but sometimes it feels that way. The rewards you find here and there spur you toward others, or so you hope.

If that were the only flaw of the book I’m returning, that it didn’t yield anything I could use in my project, I’d take all the blame for my bad judgment and trade it in at the local used book store. But this new book is so bad that I didn’t want anyone else wasting their money on it, which is why I decided I had to return it. Return numbers tell authors, editors, and publishing houses that books didn’t pass the muster.

I feel obligated to be generous with fellow authors whenever I can. The work we do is tough. It often goes unrewarded. As hard as we try, I’ve yet to meet an author – and I certainly count myself among them – who hasn’t turned out something subpar. For these reasons, I won’t mention here the title or the author of the book I’m returning, but I will say that I’ve seen this pattern before: an author with an established track record in nonfiction writes a book that gets a few rave reviews, and then under pressure churns out another that she must at some level realize she isn’t proud of. A team of assistants do most of the research, which the author cobbles together using a few narrative tricks: long descriptive lists of settings that are only peripheral to the people who matter, embellishment of facts to create pseudo-scenes, and broad strokes to summarize character traits, delivered in language sloppy with purpled prose and clichés.

In this book I’m returning, the transitions between the broader context of US history and individual narrative are so clunky, transparent, ludicrous that they’re laughable; I couldn’t help reading them out loud, interrupting my partner from the book he was reading, which happened to be a recent but well-crafted narrative from roughly the same era. From a summary of pre-Civil War slavery that might have come from a tenth-grade textbook, the author of my soon-to-be-returned book segues by saying that the main character’s mother is enslaved by her psyche. A few paragraphs on the woman’s inheritance follow, and then we’re returned to the broader context with, “Money may have ruled discussions in the ….households, but it was the demands of the South that inundated conversations around the rest of the country.” Really, author? That’s the best you could do? After several of these forced transitions, I couldn’t take any more. I had to quit reading.

From the book I did learn one thing. Whatever my project’s flaws, they will not be these. I refuse to make a lazy pass of the hard work that goes into crafting an engaging historical narrative – or any narrative, for that matter. My project must be more than worth the reader’s time. To honor Kate Carmack, to honor the reader, the book must be authentic and memorable and true.

$27.95 for a sloppy product, when authors and editors and publishers are scrambling fiendishly to assure the public that books are worth buying? No thanks. 

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

A Writer's Mandate

Kate Carmack, born Shaww Tlaa
With the exception of a few work-for-hire projects, most everything I've written has been because I've wanted to, not because I had to. It's a curse and a joy, this freedom. Writers get to indulge in pretty much anything, limited only by language and imagination. They also get to take a lot of wrong turns. Most have files bulging projects gone wrong.

Then there are those stories that have to be told, stories that for one reason or another can't be relegated to the never-mind folder. Wealth Woman: Kate Carmack and the Last Great Race for Gold is one of those. Once deemed the richest Indian woman in America, Kate claimed to have made the discovery of a lifetime. Though cheated out of her fortune, she stood her ground between cultures. Hers will the first book-length, mass-market gold rush history to be told from the point of view of the ones who were there first, the Indians.

From the beginning, I knew this was a story that had to be told, and that I was the one to tell it. How I reached that conclusion, and how I'm handling dozens and dozens (hundreds and hundreds?) of decisions and dilemmas connected with getting Kate's story into print will inform my 2013 teaching series. How to know this is a story that must be told? How to evaluate the merits of a project? How to know you're the right person to write it? How to organize research material? How to outline the narrative? How to refine the narrative style? Which title? How to put together a proposal? How to attract the interest of an agent and editor? How to deal with conflicting primary source material? What constitutes truth in history? In narrative? What place is there for invention in nonfiction? How to balance summary and scene? How to write scenes grounded in historical fact? How to cite sources? How to know when to stop researching and start writing? How to handle revision? How to handle culturally sensitive material? How to keep your momentum? How to pace the narrative? How decide on your form? 

These questions (and more) will be among those I address here. Whether you have an interest in writing, the Klondike, American Indian history, mining, the West, or gold, consider this your invitation to tag along as I see through to completion a project that's called to me from the start: the story of Kate Carmack and the Last Great Race for Gold.